NEW CLASS for experienced pilots.
Ron Van Putte
vanputte at nuc.net
Mon Jul 28 18:04:44 AKDT 2003
jim ivey wrote:
> Next contest bring your SPA plane and I will take you on with my
> Daddy Rabbit. We will fly expert maneuvers. How long has it been since
> you put 3 loops on top of each other and in the same plane?
> Joshin'
>
I have an SPA-legal Kirkland Intruder which is configured just as Jim
Kirkland flew it when he won the Nats in 1970. It has a Super Tigre
G-60 Bluehead engine and is also painted exactly as Kirkland 's airplane
was. There is no way I'd accept a challenge to fly against a Daddy
Rabbit with an OS .91 4-stroke engine in it. When the SPA allowed the
.91 4-stroke engines in SPA events, I dropped out, because the nostalgia
was gone. The logic of allowing those engines but disallowing retracts
escaped me. Kirkland's 1970 airplane had retracts.
Ron Van Putte
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ron Van Putte
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 6:32 PM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: NEW CLASS for experienced pilots.
>
>
>
> jim ivey wrote:
>
>> I'm over 60. What you gonna do with Me?
>>
>
>
> A mere youngster. Barely old enough for AARP. Doesn't even
> qualify for Medicare. You will know you are getting old when it
> hurts to get out of bed in the morning and you realize that it's
> as good as you'll feel all day.
>
> Ron Van Putte
>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Henderson,Eric
>> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 1:52 PM
>> To: discussion at nsrca.org
>> Subject: RE: NEW CLASS for experienced pilots.
>>
>> Maybe one SPA class for over 55's with mixed planes....
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
>> [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of GW
>> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 1:51 PM
>> To: discussion at nsrca.org
>> Subject: Re: NEW CLASS for experienced pilots.
>>
>> great idea. SPA style planes(older designs-Nostalgia-Pattern)
>> mixed into AMA pattern.
>> That will raise attendance and promote growth.
>>
>> GW
>> Gerald Williams
>> Email : gw at gwair.com <mailto:gw at gwair.com>
>> Webpage: www.gwair.com <http://www.gwair.com/>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Henderson,Eric <mailto:Eric.Henderson at gartner.com>
>> To: discussion at nsrca.org <mailto:discussion at nsrca.org>
>> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 9:45 AM
>> Subject: RE: NEW CLASS for experienced pilots.
>>
>> I like suggestions - good one Dean!
>>
>> E.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
>> <mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org>
>> [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Dean Pappas
>> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 10:41 AM
>> To: discussion at nsrca.org <mailto:discussion at nsrca.org>
>> Subject: RE: NEW CLASS for experienced pilots.
>>
>> Why not add noise-limited Nostalgia-Pattern at our events?
>> Regards,
>> Dean
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Henderson,Eric [mailto:Eric.Henderson at gartner.com]
>> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 10:35 AM
>> To: discussion at nsrca.org
>> Subject: NEW CLASS for experienced pilots.
>>
>> After several long "fireside chats" a similar
>> non-turnaround thought pattern came up about over
>> 55's having a non-turnaround class.
>>
>> Complex center maneuvers (e.g. easier to see) for the
>> old guys but non-scored turnarounds. Keep it to say,
>> 10 maneuvers. Would make judging a lot easier. Could
>> retain more pattern pilots as they age!? (Even CD's :-))
>>
>> Lest we not forget our biggest challenge is numbers
>> of participants. As a % of RC pilots we are a decimal
>> point! That scares me. Not enough youth and then we
>> have the "silverbacks" giving up because the routines
>> stretch their vision on turnaround maneuvers.
>>
>> If it was not for the noise problem of the older
>> designs I'd also run SPA at a 401-406 pattern event.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Eric.
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20030728/80f29709/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list