NEW CLASS for experienced pilots.
Bill Glaze
billglaze at triad.rr.com
Mon Jul 28 10:05:28 AKDT 2003
Eric:
Talk about brainstorming; I think you may be on to something. As an
aside, I would really enjoy some kind of a contest with kindred souls
that would let me employ an Astro-Hog, and be reasonably competitive.
Always been a sentimental favorite with me; won a lot with it in the
50's and early 60's, and was there at it's (Astro-Hog's) birth. It's
really a good flying sport airplane, even by today's standards.
Sure some good ideas surfacing, here.
Bill Glaze
"Henderson,Eric" wrote:
> I like suggestions - good one Dean!E.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Dean Pappas
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 10:41 AM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: RE: NEW CLASS for experienced pilots.
>
> Why not add noise-limited Nostalgia-Pattern at our events?Regards,
> Dean
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henderson,Eric [mailto:Eric.Henderson at gartner.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 10:35 AM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: NEW CLASS for experienced pilots.
>
> After several long "fireside chats" a similar non-turnaround
> thought pattern came up about over 55's having a
> non-turnaround class.Complex center maneuvers (e.g. easier
> to see) for the old guys but non-scored turnarounds. Keep it
> to say, 10 maneuvers. Would make judging a lot easier. Could
> retain more pattern pilots as they age!? (Even CD's :-))Lest
> we not forget our biggest challenge is numbers of
> participants. As a % of RC pilots we are a decimal point!
> That scares me. Not enough youth and then we have the
> "silverbacks" giving up because the routines stretch their
> vision on turnaround maneuvers.If it was not for the noise
> problem of the older designs I'd also run SPA at a 401-406
> pattern event.
> Regards,
> Eric.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20030728/e9b5d840/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list