Avoidance Rule
Gray E Fowler
gfowler at raytheon.com
Fri Jan 31 05:39:53 AKST 2003
He is a good soldier!
Gray Fowler
Principal Chemical Engineer
Composites Engineering
"Tomanek, Wojtek" <tomanekw at saic-abingdon.com>
Sent by: discussion-request at nsrca.org
01/31/2003 08:32 AM
Please respond to discussion
To: "'discussion at nsrca.org'" <discussion at nsrca.org>
cc:
Subject: RE: Avoidance Rule
"This is my personal experience. I have seen 3 mid airs at a contest in 4
years. On the AVERAGE we have 25 flyers at 6 rounds per contest, 6
contests per year. That is 3600 flights/3 mid airs or 0.08%."
- These statistics may not be comforting to "Mid-Air" Matt who lost two or
three planes several years ago at the beginning of the season <G>
-----Original Message-----
From: Gray E Fowler [mailto:gfowler at raytheon.com]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:25 AM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: RE: Avoidance Rule
I understand this discussion if it made mid-airs less frequent, but look
at the numbers first prior to really putting something in that slows down
a contest or adds other inconvenience.
This is my personal experience. I have seen 3 mid airs at a contest in 4
years. On the AVERAGE we have 25 flyers at 6 rounds per contest, 6
contests per year. That is 3600 flights/3 mid airs or 0.08%.
No one likes to lose a plane ( happened to me during practice-it was
Lance's fault and that makes me feel better) but no one likes to drive to
a contest and not get a maximum of flights in either. Calling out
avoidance and bailing just does not seem to work with me, as Lance
mentioned if you are gonna hit it will be a big surprize-no one can call
you off in time. The reality probably is that at an I MAC event if someone
bailed they were close but not really going to hit. The argument about
lots more money does not work either because of the time required to build
a plane outweighs the cost(for most). Also if money was a legitimate
argument then since pattern planes only cost $2-3K instead of $5-6K IMAC
then we could accept the risk. Pattern contests in D6 always try to run
rapid and smooth where as the IMAC guys are allowed to land and re-fuel
after round 1-still on the clock, then go up for round 2. They just do not
seem to be as concerned! about packing in the flights. The "weather"
reason is strange too as if lightning or something appear the CD would
shut down (except Gene-he most likely would yell "stay out there you
weenie.....you need to learn to fly in all conditions")-not the call of
the flyer. If it got "dangerously windy" or something else-geeez its a
hobby....dump the round and save your stinkin' plane-once again if the
flyer could make this call it could wreak havoc and even spur on momentum
to increase the weight limit or some other sensitive rule-issue(thats a
dry joke!).
Consider yourself a soldier-Take the Patton attitude, some of you are
gonna die, ( or the Full Metal Jacket attitude "better you than me") the
rest of us live patternly happily after ever.
And NO I do not think I am Karma destined for a mid-air. Statistically
speaking I a clear because I already had my mid-air (except for the
reality that the statistical facts say my chances for a midair are the
same every time I go up at a contest). So I hope-better you than me.
Have a nice weekend
Gray Fowler
Principal Chemical Engineer
Composites Engineering
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20030131/97f586d0/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list