Rules proposals in MA

[george kennie]

Maybe not, Anthony. But then I'm not sure either. Sounds like, to me, that a guy
flying only 100 feet out is at the other side of the runway, at least at my home
field.Can you imagine trying to eyeball the turnarounds at this distance.Talk
about trapezoidal geometries.
Now if they wanted to talk about going to the 75 degree box I could be strongly
influenced.
Without a DZ I think it becomes pretty dificult to fly at the 150 meter mark or
less and not crowd the box, or at least that's my experience.
Georgie

Anthony Romano wrote:

> Wouldn't that really increase the footprint? Great for sound control. I
> guess it is ok if you have unlimited real estate.
>
> Anthony
>
> >From: BUDDYonRC at aol.com
> >Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org
> >To: discussion at nsrca.org
> >Subject: Rules proposals in MA
> >Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 10:04:57 EST
> >
> >Am I reading them correctly? ( In the current issue of Model Aviation)
> >Is there a rules change proposal in IMAC that eliminates the 75 degree box
> >lines and replaces it with a rectangular box with a minimum distance out of
> >100 feet?
> >This looks on the surface like it is a good idea and might even work for
> >pattern.
> >Buddy
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#