Why quit pattern.

[Bob]

All
 
Well I'm taking the grandkids to Nashville this weekend and, of course,
hobby shop scouting is mandatory.  Anyone know of a good pattern type hobby
shop in Music City?
 
Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Pastorello [mailto:rcaerobob at cox.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 7:14 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Why quit pattern.


It would be interesting to know the demographics of the sample group.  What
regions/states?  How many?  What classes did they fly when they quit?
 
And - I've said this before - and usually NO one chooses to get realistic
about it and respond- in our region, we have MANY contests where everyone is
busting their butts to be able to FINISH flying a 5 rounder due to numbers
of entrants.  Some only become a FOUR rounder.
    Then, there's the lopsided numbers of folks in Masters, who have all the
other classes done, or juggling flight lines, or whatever while that class
has to finish.  And since contestants of OTHER classes are always in the J.
chair, THEIR lines can't start (frequently).
    I've CD'd and struggled with that issue.  It's real.
 
Many contests have plenty of flyers to fill up a weekend.  There are already
many regions with conflicts because there are SO MANY contests, so close
together that THAT issue becomes a problem.  And only so many weekends to
have events.
 
I guess I'm getting old enough, and narrow-minded enough, to begin to wonder
- 
    WHAT IS THE PROBLEM?
 
Do we WANT a bunch more pilots trying to wedge in logistics of practice
times crowding at club fields, and contest times on contest day....?
    Or is it "okay" to have the typical ebb and flow of participation that
seems to follow the game?
 
Of course, if a particular area/region/state has some participation issues,
maybe THEY should work on it.
    I just don't think we have a Pandemic-Pending-Pattern death cycle upon
us.
 
 
P.S. - I also am just "noise" on the list, have no knowledge of what I'm
talking about, and haven't contributed at all to the game.  YMMV.

Bob Pastorello, Oklahoma
NSRCA 199, AMA 46373
rcaerobob at cox.net <mailto:rcaerobob at cox.net> 
www.rcaerobats.net <http://www.rcaerobats.net> 
 
 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Henderson,Eric <mailto:Eric.Henderson at gartner.com>  
To: discussion at nsrca.org <mailto:discussion at nsrca.org>  
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 1:36 PM
Subject: Why quit pattern.

In a previous note I said that I would post the results of my informal
survey of pilots who quit the sport in the last six years.The good news is
that many people continue to contact all of us and get into pattern.
Personal contact helps enormously and it soon shows up as a regularly
competing pilot. We attend contests for many reasons. It is a
birds-of-a-feather gathering. We can talk pattern-speak up-the-gazoo and see
what is the latest gizmo or plane or engine. 
 
So why do people stop competing?
 
There are many reasons, some are unique and some are unavoidable. I listed
the reasons in uncommon to most common. (The last reason on my list is the
most common.) [All identities are absolutely protected, so don't ask who
please]
 
 
1. Once in a while a person competes who is just not cut out for
competition. It affects them badly, degrades their skills temporarily and
just plain gets to them if they are not successful. Even when successful the
stress of Competitions just makes them behave badly. Sooner, rather than
later, they quit, usually for some other sport.
 
2. A big change in their lives. A new partner, new job, losing one or both.
Children getting older - T-ball, b-ball soccer etc.
 
3. Cost. Not that it was too much, but they began spending too much for very
little in return. They felt that unless they had the latest equipment they
would not get the scores.
 
4. Time. Interestingly enough it was not building time but flying time. They
could not dedicate the practice time to handle new routines or do well with
existing ones. Not happy with their performance because of lack of practice.
 
5. Age and eyesight
 
6. Judging. The common thread was that none of the pilots felt that they
could get a fair shake  There two main reasons for their conclusion. The
first was that they found the standard of judging did not meet their flying
skills. They knew from contest after contest and personal contact that the
people behind them did not know the rules. They felt that no matter how well
they executed the geometry it would not be scored correctly against pilots
who did not execute as well.
    The second reason was that they had built up enough prejudices in the
folks that coul could be judging them. Old feuds from previous classes. Guys
who they used to hammer were now getting even on those who had now moved up.
Personal grudges and personality conflicts regards less of competition
history. How many times have you heard this "I know that if so-and-so is in
the chair might as well not fly?. 
 
(The last one is the down side of pilot judging. I also heard it about
non-flying judges of the past and present). 
 
I spent a lot of my time looking a how to fix these issues. I had to
conclude that I could not do much with 1, 2, 3 and 5.
 
With #4, we should think very carefully about changing schedules too often.
Changing masters every three years is enough for the core who pay to
compete.
 
With #6, I don't have a lot of ideas that would work. All I can say is that
if we drive people away and we have very little influx of youth, then we
will have less folks to judge!
 
Regards,

Eric 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20031211/ba79d2f0/attachment.html