Fuel/Water, Bearing/Rust

[Rcmaster199 at aol.com]

Interesting observation Jeff. Here's one more for you. The metric should be a 
constant but it isn't. What bearing feels gritty to me, doesn't to you, or 
vice versa. Or is the metric "if you can hear the engine's bearing noise, it's 
time for a change". Or is it something else entirely

After-run treatment perhaps may not be as important as "running treatment". I 
suspect there-in lies much of the answer, with control of cooling and lean 
running conditions, being up at the top of the chart. 
One man's opinion

Matt K


> Subj:Re: Fuel/Water, Bearing/Rust 
> Date:12/10/2003 7:26:13 AM Eastern Standard Time
> From:<A HREF="mailto:jhughes at hsonline.net">jhughes at hsonline.net</A>
> Reply-to:<A HREF="mailto:discussion at nsrca.org">discussion at nsrca.org</A>
> To:<A HREF="mailto:discussion at nsrca.org">discussion at nsrca.org</A>, <A HREF="mailto:discussion at nsrca.org">discussion at nsrca.org</A>
> Sent from the Internet 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> So, some people are running them dry with good results, some are 
> leaving fuel in them with good results, some are using after run oil 
> with good results. I'm begining to think it doesn't matter how you 
> store your engines!

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20031210/6aef9eb5/attachment.html