P Factor is the same if the prop and rpm are the same. Weither motor or engine turning the prop doesn't matter.
Del
----- Original Message -----
From: Wayne Galligan
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 7:46 AM
Subject: e-power
I can only imagine that e-power= less vibration=longer equipment life=longer flight pack battery life=less cleanup=hmmmmmmm! starting to sound(ohh yah less noise) like the future of modeling power source.
One more thing... what is the difference in torque between glow and e-power. How much p-factor is involved with e-power vs. glow/gas?
Wayne G.
----- Original Message -----
From: Mike McConville
To: 'discussion at nsrca.org'
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:26 AM
Subject: RE: Poland - electric
I dont believe Jason has the prop stopping in stall turns or downlines. That
video was a test flight, and no set-up had been dialed in yet.
Seems to be the downlines would be one of the big advantaged of ep, as you
could dial the motor RPM to whatever is optimum for breaking. A lot of cool
stuff happening!
m
-----Original Message-----
From: randy10926 at comcast.net [mailto:randy10926 at comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:22 AM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Poland - electric
Watched the videos. Man they are great. Anyone know what a set-up like the
one Jason is using costs and where to get the parts. That power without
having
to clean up after each flight and the end of the day.
Randy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20030807/868e085a/attachment.html