S.S.Bearing- What to Do about it??
Bill Glaze
billglaze at triad.rr.com
Tue Aug 5 08:39:23 AKDT 2003
Del:
FWIW, I talked to Tom Collins at Muncie. He said that on some engines
there had been a production problem, that let chips into the pump. He
recommended checking all new engines. (Probably wouldn't hurt some of
the older ones, also.) I've known Tom for many years; never known him to
b.s. yet, even when it would be to his advantage. BTW: I'm not using
Mintors, so I have no axe to grind. Just thought the info might be
useful to some folks.
Bill Glaze
Del Rykert wrote:
> Then some Mintors are having pump problems. Del
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: patterndude at comcast.net
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 6:20 AM
> Subject: Re: S.S.Bearing- What to Do about it??
> Bob,
> The only engine I know of that has designed their crankcase
> to handle an
> improved bearing is the 3M Mintor 170. It has a double row
> of balls. This
> doubles the radial load capacity.
> --Lance
> www.aeroslave.com
> > Assuming that OS doesn't offer a solution to lubrication
> of the rear bearing on
> > the 1.40, what other options are available?
> > What mods could be made to the crankcase to permit
> more oil flow back there?
> > Would increasing oil content of fuel make any
> difference?
> >
> > If the real core problem is undersizing of the bearing for
> the load application
> > the motor endures, then a real fix would be a redesign of
> the crankcase to use a
> > larger and wider bearing. Pretty unlikely that would
> happen, I would guess.
> > So what's the solution besides keeping the bearing
> suppliers well-funded??
> >
> > Bob Pastorello, Oklahoma
> > NSRCA 199, AMA 46373
> > rcaerobob at cox.net
> > www.rcaerobats.net
> >
> >
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20030805/39407ce9/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list