OS BEARINGS
Wayne Galligan
wgalligan at goodsonacura.com
Tue Aug 5 05:48:40 AKDT 2003
Then a grove machined in the bottom of the crankcase up to the opening of the crank inlet would be the place to make this groove...right? How could one do this with standard shop tools and not ruin his engine?
Wayne
----- Original Message -----
From: Karl G. Mueller
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: OS BEARINGS
Wayne,
On the compression stroke the passage in the crank
for the carb would be opposite to the carb opening and
therefore closed.
Karl.
----- Original Message -----
From: Wayne Galligan
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:22 AM
Subject: OS BEARINGS
If you machined a groove towards the rear bearing you would lose crank pressure or get blow back to the carb opening from the crankcase pressure wouldn't you?
WG
----- Original Message -----
From: Verne Koester
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 10:39 PM
Subject: Re: Mintor 140 Bearings
Bob,
Interestingly enough, my RX has the groove you describe going forward toward
the front bearing (which is shielded anyway) but nothing rearward. I
considered that as a last option if nothing else worked, but haven't needed
to as yet.
Since they already have a shielded bearing in the front, I have to assume
that groove is there to lube the crank journal in the case between the carb
opening and the front bearing. If that's the case, then why no groove to
lube the journal between the carb opening and the rear bearing? Friction
equals heat, right? Maybe they're relying on the heated aluminum case
expanding enough to allow oil in there but then there'd be no reason for the
forward groove.
Verne
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20030805/50b6582f/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list