Poland - Electric.
Henderson,Eric
Eric.Henderson at gartner.com
Tue Aug 5 03:48:39 AKDT 2003
To the best of my knowledge, Chip stayed with the bi-plane at the Nat's.
Eric.
-----Original Message-----
From: Atwood, Mark [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of
Atwood, Mark
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 8:11 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: RE: Poland - Electric.
I'd have to disagree with you on this one Ron. Part of competing at this level is picking the right equipment...and that varies flight to flight, contest to contest. From the choice of props to the amount of nitro, how your needle's set, to which plane you fly. Chip made that even more apparent (from what I'm told) at the Nat's switching between the bipe and his monoplane depending on conditions.
Some could argue that the choice of a Bipe in the first place is more to "make a statement" and "get noticed" than flying characteristics...BOTH play a huge role in influencing the judges whether we want to admit it or not.
We chose the pilots who did the best job of influencing the judges at the team trials...and we should leave it up to their expertise to do the best job of influencing the judges at the worlds. Whether that be by changing planes or flying style...which would lead to a similar point. Chip has always excelled in world competition because he can adapt...he flys the style that's getting scored...and flys it well. Should we limit him to flying only the style that he flew at the team trials???
You're correct that Jason's success or failure will draw a lot of comments either way. But I'm an advocate of no risk...no reward.
-Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Van Putte [mailto:vanputte at nuc.net]
Sent: Mon 8/4/2003 6:23 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: Poland - Electric.
Henderson,Eric wrote:
> I had heard this several times and a question kept nagging away in the
> deeper recesses...
>
> Here goes. If you are selected to represent your country flying one
> type of plane and power plant, is it kosher to switch to a new design
> or radically different power source, such as electric?
>
My opinion - NO.
It wouldn't bother me so much if he wasn't doing it for (his) business
reasons. He'd better do very well or he will be second guessed forever.
Ron Van Putte
> .
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Dave Smith
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 5:13 PM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Cc: pattern at rcmailinglists.com
> Subject: Poland
>
> Just heard from my spy in Poland. Jason Shulman arrived with an
> electric pattern plane.
>
> 42 volt motor, 60 amps. Flying weight of plane is 10.75 pounds.
> Prop might be a 20x17.
>
> Very impressive and very quiet. I don't know if his other plane is
> glow or electric.
>
> Dave
>
>
==================# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list