Masters 2005 Options

Bob Pastorello rcaerobob at cox.net
Wed Oct 23 17:53:45 AKDT 2002


Yes

No

Bob Pastorello
NSRCA 199, AMA 46373
rcaerobob at cox.net
www.rcaerobats.net


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: John Ferrell 
  To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 8:47 PM
  Subject: Re: Masters 2005 Options


  Now that we have had a little experience with the 2002-4 rules it would be a really good time for some one outside  the committee to evaluate the impact (positive & negative) of what we did. Of course I have my own opinions. I cannot believe all of the changes rated 10's! 

  Then again, would it serve any purpose?

  John Ferrell 
  6241 Phillippi Rd
  Julian NC 27283
  Phone: (336)685-9606  
  Dixie Competition Products
  NSRCA 479 AMA 4190  W8CCW
  "My Competition is Not My Enemy"


   
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Bob Pastorello 
    To: discussion at nsrca.org 
    Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 7:49 PM
    Subject: Re: Masters 2005 Options


    John, I appreciate a LOT you putting it in print.  Don't think I've seen it summarized as well or concisely...
        There are MANY who will press that the sequences are to be "building blocks" to some ultimate goal of complexity and par-level competitiveness with the FAI trends.  THAT I don't agree with.
        I particuarly like the criteria about "judgeable by available judges" - that is SO important....as Troy pointed out, the more difficult and "new" you make maneuvers, the more "judging load" is placed on - Guess Who? - *US*....If there's a reasonable purpose to that, I'm all for it, but I don't read much in terms of justifiable rationale for making sequences more difficult.
        Anyone know the REAL answer? (this is also related to the core question I've had - "WHY a 5kg UPPER limit??")

    Bob Pastorello
    NSRCA 199, AMA 46373
    rcaerobob at cox.net
    www.rcaerobats.net


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20021023/3ab5cd67/attachment.html


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list