rules change decodeing

[Ron Van Putte]

My point is that we (NSRCA) will have an option to use the maneuver 
schedule which was submitted for Contest Board approval, OR we can come 
up with a different one if the Annex proposal passes.

Ron Van Putte


Buddy Brammer wrote:

> I stand corrected.
> 
> And is it right that the correct description should be  That if 
> the Annex System is approved by AMA then the new Masters pattern change 
> request submitted to AMA will be voided or withdrawn as a non issue as 
> far as AMA is concerned, and the new masters pattern for 2005 will be 
> decided by NSRCA in the manner selected and approved by the membership?
> 
> Buddy 
> 
>  >From: Ron Van Putte
>  >Reply-To: vanputte at nuc.net
>  >To: discussion at nsrca.org
>  >Subject: Re: rules change decodeing
>  >Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 12:23:15 -0600
>  >
>  >Buddy Brammer's summary of the survey results and the rule change
>  >proposals appears correct to me, except that he wrote, "Change the
>  >masters sequence as approved in question 28". This sequence would
>  >only be THE Master sequence if the proposal for it passes and the
>  >Annex proposal fails. If the Annex proposal passes, the NSRCA has
>  >the option of inserting a different sequence in the Annex for the
>  >Master class.
>  >
>  >Ron Van Putte

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#