AMA rules-weight, gasers?

[Rcmaster199 at aol.com]

In a message dated 11/14/2002 10:40:33 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
s.vannostrand at kodak.com writes:

> Subj: Re: AMA rules-weight, gasers? 
>  Date: 11/14/2002 10:40:33 AM Eastern Standard Time
>  From: <A HREF="mailto:s.vannostrand at kodak.com">s.vannostrand at kodak.com</A>
>  Reply-to: <A HREF="mailto:discussion at nsrca.org">discussion at nsrca.org</A>
>  To: <A HREF="mailto:discussion at nsrca.org">discussion at nsrca.org</A>
>  File: InterScan_Disclaimer.txt (907 bytes) DL Time (74642 bps): <1 minute
>  Sent from the Internet 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Tom, 
> I was disappointed in reading your detailed and informative message.  How 
> dare you inject logic and reality into an otherwise oblivious discussion.  
> Many people have commented that the current rules are like a house of 
> cards.  If the weight limit changes, then we won't be able to control 
> ourselves and all our rules (the other 2) will have to be changed too.  
> Plane size and noise limits will get out of control.  New aerodynamic laws 
> will be discovered that will force completely new designs that can only be 
> made from exotic materials.  All current equipment will become obsolete. 
> 
> What has worked well in Australia has a high risk of failing here.  The 
> equator reverses logic. 
> 
> Sorry guys, maybe I didn't sleep well last night <G>. 
> --Lance 
> 

I think you slept just fine Lance. I promised myself I was not going to "flog 
that dead horse" again (Aussies have such a neat way with words)
and I will keep my promise. 

Weight limit again ---ARRGGGGHHHHH.. Gag me with a spoon

Matt K
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20021114/cb3c5681/attachment.html