Weight Limit-really marketing/popularity/etc
Wes
wesslack at pacbell.net
Tue Nov 12 14:49:39 AKST 2002
OK, but how many of those park flyer drivers are members of the AMA?
Isn't the magazine supposed to be for AMA members?
Regards, &c...Wes
Richard Hallett wrote:
> It is sad but simple marketing. I can't buy what I used to buy at
> Wal-Mart because there were not enough people like me buying that
> object Park flyers presently probably outnumber pattern in the order
> of 1000+ to 1. You have x number of pages. Who gets them? We are
> lucky to see an article every second month on the basis of numbers we
> have more pages per plane than we deserve. Rick
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Mike Hester
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 7:28 PM
> Subject: Re: Weight Limit-really marketing/popularity/etc
> HAHAHAHA Damn Gray I'm about to fall over!!!! I find it
> sick that MA is cutting the pattern column to bi monthly
> because *ahem* "nobody is interested". Well DUH!!! 100 pages
> of nothing but park fliers and junk ARFs and useless reviews
> of said junk. Please. When's the last time you saw a pattern
> plane on the cover of MA? I'm thinking....I honestly can't
> remember. I bet half the people see that Andy jesky ad and
> say "whut kinda plane izzat? Does it 3 dee? Don't luk like
> no edge..." I also find it amusing that in the latest MA,
> they are talking about an online magazie and they are going
> to push guess what? The new exhilirating rage of R/C....PARK
> FLIERS!!! Gosh, I just can't contain myself. I mean, they're
> ok, they're cute, nothing against them, but they are cutting
> pattern out of the picture and replacing it with a serious
> push towards PARK FLIERS???? Does this mean the AMA is sick
> of trying to help us keep fields and wants everyone to just
> start flying in the back yard???? And here I thought the AMA
> pres was an ex-pattern pilot, and a pretty darned good one
> in his day. Did someone drop something on his head? Has Dave
> Brown gone completely insane? Ok that was my rant for the
> year. Mild, but necessary. -Mike Hester
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gray E Fowler
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:24 AM
> Subject: RE: Weight Limit-really
> marketing/popularity/etc
>
>
>
> Like Buddy mentioned its the magazines, not some
> concerted effort by IMAC to market sportsman. I do
> not believe I have ever seen anything from IMAC,
> but every model mag has either a scale warbird OR
> a scale .40 IMAC plane on the cover. Real IMAC
> planes are ONLY shown on covers of anything in the
> hover position, and we all know how important that
> is(speaking of that , perhaps someone should
> mention to the self proclaimed #1 pattern supply
> place that perhaps a new photo would be in order
> to appease us-my personal choice would be of an
> Aries).
> Perhaps a Pattern marketing effort could help, but
> "IMAC style" became popular because the magazines
> are all in a vicious butt sniffing mode to get out
> the latest reveiw of the NEW 60 sized IMAC type
> ARF-gotta be an ARF or no one will buy it right?
> Why this frenzy I have no idea, but it is not IMAC
> marketing (unless there is some serious under the
> table stuff-but I honestly think if anyone is
> paying money its gotta be the Chinese).
>
> PS-what the RC world really needs the mags to do
> is give us one more review on the NEW .40 P-51
> ARF, complete with genuine imitation exhaust
> stacks for more realistic runway fly-bys. Report
> on how the first take -off was...did it pull right
> and require left rudder-I gotta know.....
>
>
> Just an opinion
>
>
> Gray Fowler
> Principal Chemical Engineer
> Composites Engineering
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20021112/b0b6844a/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list