A Money Saving Though...Re: K-Factor Status

Thomas C. Weedon weedon at wwnet.net
Mon Nov 4 06:11:49 AKST 2002


Well, Mr. Tomanek, I'll accept your volunteer help to write 12 quality
articles every year, on time, spell checked, and technical in nature.
That'll keep ya busy for a while.
Tom W.

-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
[mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Tomanek, Wojtek
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 10:17 AM
To: 'discussion at nsrca.org'
Subject: RE: RE: A Money Saving Though...Re: K-Factor Status


Sorry, I have to strongly disagree with cutting down number of issues,
especially if I get to save $5 or maybe $7, or whatever - saving few $ on
membership dues should not be the key concern here.  If we want to
popularize precision aerobatics and keep all of us informed "Less is NOT
going to give us More exposure".

WKT

	-----Original Message-----
	From:	glenn hatfield [SMTP:randy10926 at comcast.net]
	Sent:	Monday, November 04, 2002 10:10 AM
	To:	discussion at nsrca.org
	Subject:	Re: RE: A Money Saving Though...Re: K-Factor Status

	I second the motion.
	Randy -2422



	----- Original Message -----
	From: "Martin X. Moleski, SJ" <moleski at canisius.edu>
	Date: Monday, November 4, 2002 9:55 am
	Subject: RE: A Money Saving Though...Re: K-Factor Status

	> --On Monday, November 04, 2002 6:00 AM -0500 "Thomas C. Weedon"
	> <weedon at wwnet.net> wrote:
	>
	> > ... The most immediate way to cut costs would be to reduce the
	> number of issues
	> > per year, like 6 or 8. The savings would be more than enough to
	> keep dues
	> > down and the workload for everyone concerned would be decreased.
	>
	> Let me just interrupt this discussion to say thanks to Tom Weedon,
	> Brian Clemmons, Eric Henderson, and everybody who has been working
	> hard in the background to get the K-Factor back up to speed.
	>
	> You guys are great!
	>
	>                                                	Marty #2874
	> =====================================
	> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
	> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
	> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
	> #
	>
	>

	=====================================
	# To be removed from this list, send a message to
	# discussion-request at nsrca.org
	# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
	#
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#



More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list