Annex

[RC Steve Sterling]

Ahhhh-- according to the official NSRCA records, Rick Allison is an
honorary, lifetime member of NSRCA. Didn't check any of the others.

Allison may also be a member of IMAC, but pattern is certainly his thing. He
flew in the majority of district pattern contests this year, and still kicks
butt. Don't know that he attended any IMAC contests. He certainly is a major
NSRCA proponent here in the northwest.

-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
[mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Kurt Koelling
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 8:52 AM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Annex


FYI: Here is a list of the eleven AMA Aerobatics Contest Board
Members.  Four out of eleven are NSRCA members and six out of eleven are
IMAC members.  Only one is a member of both NSRCA and IMAC.  Surprisingly,
two are not members of either SIG!

I Scott Melville (member of NSRCA)
II Ron Lockhart (member of IMAC)
III Geoff Combs
IV Tom Miller (member of IMAC)
V John Fuqua (member of NSRCA)
VI Charles Reed  (member of IMAC)
VII David von Linsowe (member of IMAC)
VIII William Thomas (member of NSRCA)
IX Jim Mowrey
X Derek Koopowitz (member of NSRCA and IMAC)
XI Rick Allison (member of IMAC)

I am pretty sure that a majority (six or more) of these eleven people were
members of the NSRCA at one time but may not currently be a member of the
NSRCA.
Kurt Koelling

At 10:28 AM 12/14/02 -0500, you wrote:
>Bill: It's worse than that! Dave did not say majority, he said "Contest
>Board members are almost entirely, NSRCA members."
>Now, 4 is almost entirely all, of 11!
>
>Terry T.
>
>
>
>n Sat, 14 Dec 2002 09:56:07 -0600 Bill Glaze <billglaze at triad.rr.com>
>writes:
> > Interesting.  4 constitutes a majority out of a total of 11?  Perhaps
> > I should have
> > paid more attention in Political Science or my Math classes.
> > Bill Glaze
> >
> > Ron Van Putte wrote:
> >
> > > Bill Glaze wrote:
> > >
> > > > Maybe I'm confused, but the effort by Ron has nothing to do with
> > circumventing
> > > > the survey, or by making more than 3 year sequence changes.
> > > > What it does have to do with, is the ability of the NSRCA to
> > control those
> > > > things that appertain to pattern, including sequences, and not
> > having an AMA
> > > > board (most of whom are not pattern folks) making decisions
> > about what pattern
> > > > is going to fly.
> > >
> > > For those who may be interested, according to the NSRCA database,
> > the
> > > following R/C Aerobatics contest board members are members of
> > NSRCA:
> > > Scott Melville, Fohn Fuqua, Derek Koopowitz and William Thomas.
> > That's
> > > four out of an eleven member board.
> > >
> > > Here's what Dave Brown said in an e-mail to the discussion list
> > yesterday:
> > >
> > > "I am surprised that you have chosen to not pursue the
> > alternative
> > > concept of putting the schedules into an annex, which is subject
> > to the
> > > approval of the CB, as I think this would accomplish your goals,
> > without
> > > incuring the problems which triggered the rejection by the Exec
> > Council.
> > >
> > > "I believe the EC would support this approach (by not even
> > addressing
> > > it), and it would accomplish your goals. Please keep in mind that
> > the
> > > Contest Board members are almost entirely, NSRCA members."
> > >
> > > Makes you wonder about the accuracy of items included in the
> > message
> > > sent to the Executive Council, asking them to vote on rejecting
> > the
> > > annex proposal I submitted.
> > >
> > > Ron Van Putte
> > >
> > > =====================================
> > > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > > #
> >
> > =====================================
> > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > #
> >
> >
> >
>=====================================
># To be removed from this list, send a message to
># discussion-request at nsrca.org
># and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
>#

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#



=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#