Annex

[Bill Glaze]

Interesting.  4 constitutes a majority out of a total of 11?  Perhaps I should have
paid more attention in Political Science or my Math classes.
Bill Glaze

Ron Van Putte wrote:

> Bill Glaze wrote:
>
> > Maybe I'm confused, but the effort by Ron has nothing to do with circumventing
> > the survey, or by making more than 3 year sequence changes.
> > What it does have to do with, is the ability of the NSRCA to control those
> > things that appertain to pattern, including sequences, and not having an AMA
> > board (most of whom are not pattern folks) making decisions about what pattern
> > is going to fly.
>
> For those who may be interested, according to the NSRCA database, the
> following R/C Aerobatics contest board members are members of NSRCA:
> Scott Melville, Fohn Fuqua, Derek Koopowitz and William Thomas.  That's
> four out of an eleven member board.
>
> Here's what Dave Brown said in an e-mail to the discussion list yesterday:
>
> "I am surprised that you have chosen to not pursue the alternative
> concept of putting the schedules into an annex, which is subject to the
> approval of the CB, as I think this would accomplish your goals, without
> incuring the problems which triggered the rejection by the Exec Council.
>
> "I believe the EC would support this approach (by not even addressing
> it), and it would accomplish your goals. Please keep in mind that the
> Contest Board members are almost entirely, NSRCA members."
>
> Makes you wonder about the accuracy of items included in the message
> sent to the Executive Council, asking them to vote on rejecting the
> annex proposal I submitted.
>
> Ron Van Putte
>
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#