Involving the pattern community as a whole.
Ron Van Putte
vanputte at nuc.net
Fri Dec 13 11:11:20 AKST 2002
John Ferrell wrote:
> If you want this Annex thing to go anywhere, it is esential that we quit
> whimpering and write it up like IMAC's and acknowledge their wisdom and
> success. Now is a good time to start putting that together for the next
> rules cycle and consideration for an earlier presentation might be possible
> if a good case is made.
The annex proposal isn't going anywhere, except as a proposal which
includes contest board approval of maneuver descriptions and maneuver
schedules. We could write the annex proposal exactly as the IMAC people
did their successful proposal, but it would be rejected because the AMA
finally realized what IMAC has: freedom from contest board approval of
their maneuver descriptions and maneuver schedules. If anyone doesn't
believe the above, they can try e-mailing either Dave Brown
(dbrown at dbproducts.com) or Steve Kaluf (skaluf at modelaircraft.org), and
ask the question, requesting that the response be sent to the NSRCA
discussion list.
Ron Van Putte
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list