Involving the pattern community as a whole.

[Ron Van Putte]

John Ferrell wrote:

> If you want this Annex thing to go anywhere, it is esential that we quit
> whimpering and write it up like IMAC's and acknowledge their wisdom and
> success. Now is a good time to start putting that together for the next
> rules cycle and consideration for an earlier presentation might be possible
> if a good case is made.

The annex proposal isn't going anywhere, except as a proposal which 
includes contest board approval of maneuver descriptions and maneuver 
schedules.  We could write the annex proposal exactly as the IMAC people 
did their successful proposal, but it would be rejected because the AMA 
finally realized what IMAC has: freedom from contest board approval of 
their maneuver descriptions and maneuver schedules.  If anyone doesn't 
believe the above, they can try e-mailing either Dave Brown 
(dbrown at dbproducts.com) or Steve Kaluf (skaluf at modelaircraft.org), and 
ask the question, requesting that the response be sent to the NSRCA 
discussion list.

Ron Van Putte

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#