Involving the pattern community as a whole.

[Rcmaster199 at aol.com]

In a message dated 12/11/2002 5:25:21 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
tomanekw at saic-abingdon.com writes:


> 
> > I guess the question is; should the AMA be representing
> > pattern community
> > interest or be a check and balances organization for the
> > competition rules
> > or maybe just an insurance agency.
> 
> This is a question that needs serious thought.
> 
> Larry Ott - AMA 9872
>           - NSRCA 3381

Larry,

We who believe in the Annex proposal, are interested in gaining quicker 
resolution regarding pattern issues in general, and in particular, a measure 
of control over the sequences to be flown. We think that the interests of all 
US Pattern fliers are being served by the group closest to the action: that's 
us, the NSRCA. 

Some of the stuff I have read on this thread implies that we are not 
necessarily looking out for all of the Pattern pilots in this country. That 
is not true. We on the NSRCA Board all understand that all decisions made in 
regard to our lobby, affect all who want to participate in this sport,  not 
just the members. 

Just like the National Pattern Competition which requires very little input 
from the AMA per se, for management of the contest, we are in a better 
position to recommend and, hopefully, implement sequence change when it is 
wanted by the general membership. We are closer to the action than the AMA 
Contest Board is, in general, (John Fuqua notwithstanding), and definitely 
closer than the Executive Council of the AMA. 

It should not be necessary to have to wait until AMA approves or disapproves 
a sequence (or to make changes when necessary, for that matter). That's the 
bottom line, I think. 

Don't forget one very important aspect about the Annex and changes that don't 
work so well-- it would be far simpler arrangement in the event we wanted or 
needed to CHANGE BACK. The MA Precision Aerobatics columnist might have to 
explain a few more things to the general readership of the Pattern Column but 
that would be about the only draw back, if you can call it that

Matt Kebabjian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20021211/e4729113/attachment.html