Involving the pattern community as a whole.

[Martin X. Moleski, SJ]

--On Wednesday, December 11, 2002 6:10 PM -0500 ANDY HERIDER 
<andyh at bright.net> wrote:

> I disagree with you when you talk about NSRCA consulting with all
> interested AMA members.

This seems to be one of the sticking points that caused
my D2 VP (Dave Mathewson) to vote down the proposal.


> If the NSRCA ever does have a annex then that
> will become NSRCA policy. How many times has the IMAC SIG ever asked all
> AMA members interested for input on their maneuver schedules or rules
> proposals in their annex? I am not aware of any.

Me, neither.  But I am not an IMAC member.

> I think if anything the people who don't want to join the NSRCA are more
> than welcome to contests as long as they are AMA members. However, they
> will not have any influence on changes to the annex. It would only be
> fair to the NSRCA members.

Dave M. seems to disagree.  Perhaps other board members
do, too.  I was trying to accomodate his objection in my
proposal.

> I am I interpreting you correctly?

Yes.

					Marty #2874 (paypal money sent)
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#