Free Flight-The big picture

Bob Miller bd4 at inter-linc.net
Wed Dec 4 11:01:40 AKST 2002


Eloquently put Buddy.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Buddy Brammer 
  To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 1:23 PM
  Subject: Re: Free Flight-The big picture


  Bob

  Very true. There is in fact safety in numbers.and  larger numbers will help the modeling community as a whole. It takes a forward looking membership to move in the direction which benefits all. 

  SIG's will always lead the way to shape the group intrest and assure that there is stability within that group. There will always be controversy between individuals and groups, but as long as we don't loose site of the overall objective we will succeed into the future.

  The main concern is that as the membership expands the larger areas of intrest may become complacent due to lack of an objective goal or others setting their goals for them thereby fragmenting the basic needs of the entire orginization  and the smaller SIG's who have led the way toward progress in the past.

  We see this in pattern when we only have 20% of the membership voting on major items. I wonder what percentage of the membership votes in an AMA election?

  This being the case I guess it is up to those who have the energy and intrest to lead the way. My sincere hope is that we have the right leaders who posess the ability to look into the future and mould the AMA and all of it's SIG's into the best of the best.    
  Buddy


  >From: "Bob Miller" 
  >Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  >To: 
  >Subject: Re: Free Flight 
  >Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 10:09:44 -0600 
  > 
  >MessageAnd without them we would all be flying on 27.255 MHZ 
  > ----- Original Message ----- 
  > From: David Harmon 
  > To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  > Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 8:41 PM 
  > Subject: RE: Free Flight 
  > 
  > 
  > Yeah...if we didn't need the insurance policy, AMA would be gone in less than 15 minutes. 
  > Dave 
  > -----Original Message----- 
  > From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Buddy Brammer 
  > Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 3:52 PM 
  > To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  > Subject: Re: Free Flight 
  > 
  > 
  > Gray I wonder if ModelAviation/AMA will accept digital pictures? I f they will then I can have about 100 with a simple write up for each sent to them every month. I wonder if that will get their attention? Nothing else seems to, It looks like they are in bed with the ARF and Park Flyer manufacturers and are more interested in them than the members in the SIG's who do most of their work for them . 
  > 
  > BTW the other Magazines are the same I havent seen a Pattern design published in six years, Model Airplane News published a catalogue for plans available and the best they could do was Doc Brook's Crusader and a Quick Fly among a few others of the same ventage. 
  > 
  > The Bucks Talk and all we can do is Squawk.Seems like AMA is starting to act like the Fedral Government. 
  > 
  > Buddy 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > >From: "Gray E Fowler" 
  > >Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  > >To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  > >Subject: Re: Free Flight 
  > >Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 14:25:58 -0600 
  > > 
  > >What gives?......It is the GOD syndrome. (Good Ole Days). The AMA started 
  > >with FF and CL and everyone knows that FF and CL are much better and more 
  > >pure than RC just like analog recordings sound better and are "warmer" 
  > >than digital recordings. 
  > >Personally I always considered MA a FF-CL magazine. 
  > > 
  > >What we need to do as a SIG is send in 25-50 photos of pattern planes, all 
  > >at the same time for that section up front that always shows what the AMA 
  > >membership is building, which somehow always ends up being a P-51, a 
  > >Spitfire,an Extra 300 or some dorky-weird-flying trashcan or some such. 
  > >We also need to include a write up about the plane that is identical such 
  > >as, "Pattern saved my life". 
  > > 
  > >So who is with me? I have two photos to send in right now, need 48 
  > >more-everyone send it in December. 
  > > 
  > > 
  > > 
  > >Gray Fowler 
  > >Principal Chemical Engineer 
  > >Composites Engineering 
  > > 
  > > 
  > > 
  > > 
  > >"Tomanek, Wojtek" 
  > >Sent by: discussion-request at nsrca.org 
  > >12/02/2002 01:52 PM 
  > >Please respond to discussion 
  > > 
  > > 
  > > To: "'discussion at nsrca.org'" 
  > > cc: 
  > > Subject: Free Flight 
  > > 
  > > 
  > > 
  > >Ok, have you all read the latest Model Aviation editorial about how the 
  > >free 
  > >flight and control line folks constitute 10% of all modelers and thus 
  > >should 
  > >get increased attention in the magazine and other SIGs (including 
  > >precision 
  > >aerobatics) will have to give up monthly columns to bimonthly ones. I 
  > >belong to three clubs with approximately 80, 120, and 160 members. Very 
  > >few 
  > >may have a free flight glider/plane but have never flown it at the field, 
  > >same goes for control line. If you look at their NATs the same names 
  > >appear in most of the categories and even then the whole listing of names 
  > >is 
  > >shorter than the Masters list form the pattern NATs. 
  > > 
  > >What gives .............................. ?? 
  > > 
  > >my $0.02 for today 
  > >Wojtek 
  > > 
  > >===================================== 
  > ># To be removed from this list, send a message to 
  > ># discussion-request at nsrca.org 
  > ># and put leave discussion on the first line of the body. 
  > ># 
  > > 
  > > 
  > > 
  > 
  > 
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
  > Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  MSN 8 helps ELIMINATE E-MAIL VIRUSES. Get 2 months FREE*. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20021204/04740fb8/attachment.html


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list