[SA] One of a kind?

[gene.maurice at attbi.com]

I'm confused. What maneuvers do we fly that are not, or cannot, be performed in 
full scale?? Don't the elements of our figures come from the same family of 
elements as IAC and IMAC??

--
Gene Maurice
gene.maurice at attbi.com
NSRCA 877
AMA 3408
> Because, the manuvers that we fly in full scale aerobatics are nothing like we 
> fly in pattern.  However the imac stuff is more like what we fly in full scale.
> 
> Dan
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Bill Glaze 
>   To: discussion at nsrca.org 
>   Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 9:55 AM
>   Subject: Re: [SA] One of a kind?
> 
> 
>   Lance: 
>   Now I get it.  (Hadn't had my second cup of coffee!<G>)  That is an 
> interesting question.  Im going to ponder.  Bill Glaze 
>   s.vannostrand at kodak.com wrote: 
> 
>      
>     Bill, 
>     I agree that pattenr designs don't meet the rules of IMAC or TOC.  This is 
> because these groups must model full scale designs.  My question was not aimed 
> at the modeling community.  I wonder why full scale designers don't enlarge 
> pattern designs.  Once a full scale pilot flew a 25 foot wingspan Aries, then a 
> model version could be flown in IMAC.  But the question is, why aren't pattern 
> designs used in full scale?? 
>     --Lance
> 
> 
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#