[SA] One of a kind?
Applied Aerial Devices
appliedair at willapabay.org
Mon Dec 2 22:15:29 AKST 2002
Because, the manuvers that we fly in full scale aerobatics are nothing like we fly in pattern. However the imac stuff is more like what we fly in full scale.
Dan
----- Original Message -----
From: Bill Glaze
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: [SA] One of a kind?
Lance:
Now I get it. (Hadn't had my second cup of coffee!<G>) That is an interesting question. Im going to ponder. Bill Glaze
s.vannostrand at kodak.com wrote:
Bill,
I agree that pattenr designs don't meet the rules of IMAC or TOC. This is because these groups must model full scale designs. My question was not aimed at the modeling community. I wonder why full scale designers don't enlarge pattern designs. Once a full scale pilot flew a 25 foot wingspan Aries, then a model version could be flown in IMAC. But the question is, why aren't pattern designs used in full scale??
--Lance
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20021202/ba5336d3/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list