Free Flight

Thomas C. Weedon weedon at wwnet.net
Mon Dec 2 13:33:49 AKST 2002


Wojtek,
I think you should foreword your comments to the AMA. It may help if more
people express their opinion on this matter. I agree with you completely.
Tom W.


-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
[mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Tomanek, Wojtek
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 2:52 PM
To: 'discussion at nsrca.org'
Subject: Free Flight



Ok, have you all read the latest Model Aviation editorial about how the free
flight and control line folks constitute 10% of all modelers and thus should
get increased attention in the magazine and other SIGs (including precision
aerobatics) will have to give up monthly columns to bimonthly ones.  I
belong to three clubs with approximately 80, 120, and 160 members.  Very few
may have a free flight glider/plane but have never flown it at the field,
same goes for control line.   If you look at their NATs the same names
appear in most of the categories and even then the whole listing of names is
shorter than the Masters list form the pattern NATs.

What gives .............................. ??

my $0.02 for today
Wojtek

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#



More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list