[F3A-Discussion] F3A Rules proposals

[Derek Koopowitz]

Thanks for the feedback, Earl.

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Earl Haury <ejhaury at comcast.net> wrote:

>   Derek
>
> After discussing with several competitors I support the changes to the
> noise measurement process. Having been involved with measuring noise on the
> flight line in 2011 it was obvious that the potential for injury was
> greater than desired. With very few exceptions, the measured sound level
> was well below the limits suggesting that per flight measurement was also a
> huge time consumer that wasn’t necessary. Completing sound measurements
> during processing makes sense to me.
>
> I believe the proposal should clarify that, presumably, sound measurement
> isn’t an “important model characteristic” under ABR B.17.13 which calls for
> testing same for 20% of models during competition.
>
> Earl
>
>  *From:* Derek Koopowitz via F3A-Discussion <f3a-discussion at lists.f3a.us>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 14, 2015 3:16 PM
> *To:* f3a-discussion at lists.f3a.us
> *Subject:* [F3A-Discussion] F3A Rules proposals
>
>  Hi everyone,
>
> I sent out an email on March 13 and never heard anything.  There are a
> number of rules proposals that will be voted on in April at the CIAM
> meeting and I'd like feedback on them.
>
> You can view the rules in the attached.  I have supporting documentation
> that I will send separately to keep the size down.
>
> Any/all feedback would be great to have!
>
> -Derek
>
> ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> F3A-Discussion mailing list
> F3A-Discussion at lists.f3a.us
> http://lists.f3a.us/mailman/listinfo/f3a-discussion
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/f3a-discussion/attachments/20150414/72bb608c/attachment.html>